One of the paradigmatic problems understanding the origin and development of the universe from the standpoint of "Christian" theistic evolution concerns the pace of time.
If evolution, deemed slow by theistic evolutionists today, is responsible for the origin of all the species including man, then our expectation of the pace of time is "very slow." The origin of all the species, including man, took a few billions of years to be accomplished, according to current standards, beginning with the big bang. It really wasn't a "creation" in the theological sense at all.
It is plausible, then, that the progress of history, under the evolutionary regime, would likewise be slow. Perhaps it could take 10,000 years (or 10,000,000 years?) for Christ to return.
Furthermore, if the first "creation" (which isn't actually a "creation") took so long, why shouldn't the so-called "recreation" of the new heavens and the new earth also be an evolutionary process that takes just as long? If the first so-called "creation" was actually a natural process operating under the providence of God, why shouldn't the second be the same? Why should the so-called recreation take place for us believers "in the blink of an eye," when the first creation took billions of years?
It is plausible, then, that the progress of history, under the evolutionary regime, would likewise be slow. Perhaps it could take 10,000 years (or 10,000,000 years?) for Christ to return.
Furthermore, if the first "creation" (which isn't actually a "creation") took so long, why shouldn't the so-called "recreation" of the new heavens and the new earth also be an evolutionary process that takes just as long? If the first so-called "creation" was actually a natural process operating under the providence of God, why shouldn't the second be the same? Why should the so-called recreation take place for us believers "in the blink of an eye," when the first creation took billions of years?
Conclusion
The whole purpose of theistic evolution is to reconcile Christianity to organic evolution, as naturalistically understand today, because of the supposed scientific proof of the hypothesis of evolution. But, this is done by doing away with "creation." Instead of "creation," there is only the hidden hand of "divine providence" acting to control the pace and direction of organic evolution through the workings of natural law, in directions which result in the origin of our species, and in the direction of the so-called "creation" of man. But, it just isn't creation any more. And, if there is no creation, then why should there be any instantaneous recreation either?
Why is it any easier to believe in the transformation of the cosmos when Christ returns than it is to believe in the actual creation of the cosmos by Christ at the beginning? Why is the process of creation, which stands outside the bounds of science, judged by "science"? True science, which exists, cannot judge the bounds and limits of real creation. That's the whole point of the concept and the doctrine of creation!
A real creation is an article of the Christian faith, not the result of scientific inquiry.
Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. For by it the elders obtained a good testimony. By faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that the things which are seen were not made of things which are visible. (Heb 11:1-3)
Reviewed and retained.
ReplyDelete